<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes on Zend_Cache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/</link>
	<description>Developing PHP and XUL Software in the Real World</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22498</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22498</guid>
		<description>Conrad,

I would think you could do something with a custom route and Zend_Cache.

Regards,

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conrad,</p>
<p>I would think you could do something with a custom route and Zend_Cache.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22420</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22420</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob, I was wondering, is it possible to use Zend_Cache to convert my dynamic generated pages into static HTML pages?  For example,

http://www.example.com/update/show/id/3

would map to the following page:

http://www.example.com/update/show/3.html

At this time, I'm interested in page caching.

Thanks in advance,

-Conrad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob, I was wondering, is it possible to use Zend_Cache to convert my dynamic generated pages into static HTML pages?  For example,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.example.com/update/show/id/3" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/update/show/id/3</a></p>
<p>would map to the following page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.example.com/update/show/3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/update/show/3.html</a></p>
<p>At this time, I'm interested in page caching.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>-Conrad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abernethy</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22285</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abernethy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22285</guid>
		<description>@iongion: I think you're right about that, I believe it is a version of the PDT with more features.

I also have a post on my site (http://www.chrisabernethy.com/zend-framework-route-benchmarks/) that talks about profiling using eclipse, PDT, xdebug and kcachegrind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@iongion: I think you're right about that, I believe it is a version of the PDT with more features.</p>
<p>I also have a post on my site (http://www.chrisabernethy.com/zend-framework-route-benchmarks/) that talks about profiling using eclipse, PDT, xdebug and kcachegrind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iongion</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22276</link>
		<dc:creator>iongion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22276</guid>
		<description>Snowcore 

from what i discovered, the new zend studio is eclipse with a zend php plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snowcore </p>
<p>from what i discovered, the new zend studio is eclipse with a zend php plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowcore</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22274</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowcore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22274</guid>
		<description>As for me I do not like Zend Studio etc. I love Eclipse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me I do not like Zend Studio etc. I love Eclipse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22266</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22266</guid>
		<description>iongion,

I have a Zend Studio 5.5 license which has a profiler built in which is very useful at times :)

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iongion,</p>
<p>I have a Zend Studio 5.5 license which has a profiler built in which is very useful at times :)</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22265</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22265</guid>
		<description>Jeroen,

Although I only showed the database related items here, we also cached some non-db related processes.

Regards,

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeroen,</p>
<p>Although I only showed the database related items here, we also cached some non-db related processes.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22252</guid>
		<description>If you use AdoDB, why don't you just use the built-in caching possibilities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use AdoDB, why don't you just use the built-in caching possibilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22231</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22231</guid>
		<description>svenwin,

Carelessness on my part when formatting for posting here! I've updated.

Thanks,

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>svenwin,</p>
<p>Carelessness on my part when formatting for posting here! I've updated.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: svenwin</title>
		<link>http://akrabat.com/2008/07/11/notes-on-zend_cache/#comment-22230</link>
		<dc:creator>svenwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akrabat.com/?p=254#comment-22230</guid>
		<description>Is there any reason to not declare init()-method as static?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any reason to not declare init()-method as static?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
